F1 News, F1 Regulations, FIA, Teams

Of Formula1 And Team Name Changes

Posted: December 5, 2011 at 5:47 pm   /   by   /   comments (4)

We’ve had a slightly funny time in Formula1 when it comes to team names. After all, last year we had a team called ‘BMW Sauber Ferrari’! This year we had two teams calling themselves ‘Lotus’.

For the 2012 Formula1 season, we have yet another set of teams changing their names. Team Lotus Racing will be called Caterham F1 Team. Virgin Racing will be called Marussia Virgin Racing and Lotus Renault GP will be called Lotus F1 Team next season.

As much as it may seem, changing your team’s name is extremely difficult in Formula1 and needs approval from all the Formula1 team bosses, a few other important people in the FIA and the F1 Commission. It is not as simple as changing it on the company paper and needs to be stamped off by the relevant authorities.

A name change also would result in teams losing their revenues earned from participation in the previous season. This is infact the reason why we had a team called BMW Sauber Ferrari in 2010. The team’s name change to ‘Sauber F1 Team’ reflected only in the 2011 Formula1 season.

I have had readers asking me why team names are so difficult to change and why approvals are sought from so many stakeholders of the sport. While it is difficult yet, many Team Principals are in favour for easing name change regulations in the sport.

F1 teams change names when there is a ‘Title Sponsor’ involved or when the team has a new investor buying a majority stake. (eg: Virgin Racing changed to Marussia Virgin Racing) However, in the last few seasons, we have seen more than 10 name changes in Formula1 and this is where the current regulation comes into play.

Teams succeed in Formula1 (off-track and commercially) once they become brands and marketing gurus have often said and written that brands can’t be built overnight. Constant name changes of course work against brand building. Ferrari, Mclaren and even Williams are a testament to building the brand of a Formula1 team over decades and it is not surprising when they have the largest number of fans and followers online and on-ground. Infact, sponsorship associations stand to benefit from stronger team brands like Ferrari and Mclaren. Case in point: Marlboro and its two decade old sponsorship of Ferrari.

By the way, how many of you still remember Brawn GP? But if you’ve followed Formula1 for a while, team names like Minardi and even Orange Arrows F1 will be fresh in memory and how can one forget the Jordan Grand Prix team. So you get the point?

But Formula1 operates in a very cash intensive environment so when the team attracts new sponsorship or investment, one can’t not change their team and hence brand name. Teams can’t survive without sponsors and/or investors, so name changes will keep occurring in Formula1. It is only the process of changing names that probably will change sooner or later!

Having made my point, I don’t think the current regulation was made to protect the brand names of Formula1 teams!

Comments (4)

write a comment

Comment
Name E-mail Website

  • February 19, 2013 at 1:25 pm Fernando Alonso

    They don’t need to change te name of the teams

    Reply
  • December 6, 2011 at 3:04 pm Alianora La Canta

    Sahara is in the position of title sponsor, rather than team name, so doesn’t come under this complicated set of regulations. Neither does the Virgin -> Marussia Virgin change, for the same reason, though the Marussia Virgin -> Marussia change *does* require that approval.

    Buying a majority stake doesn’t trigger a formal name change either.

    The only thing which can cause a team’s name to change in the eyes of the FIA (and therefore trigger the unanimous name-change process) is when the “core” part of the name is changed. Admittedly this covers most of the examples. The rule’s there to avoid fly-by-night sponsors getting the team name and then dropping it quickly when the budget ran out, as happened to Arrows/Footwork in the early 1990s and Forti/Shannon in 1996.

    Reply
    • December 6, 2011 at 3:26 pm Kunal Shah

      Thanks guys for the comments.

      And Alianora, Sahara are co-owners of the team and not in the position of a ‘Title Sponsor’.
      Also, when one buys a majority stake, there is a possibility that they could seek a change in team name before they actually set out to change the ‘core’. 😉
      But good insight for the readers, thank you.

      Reply
  • December 6, 2011 at 9:17 am Jaideep Vaidya

    I’ve noticed you missed stating the example of Force India, or should I say Sahara Force India, here. Deliberate? 😉

    Reply
Loading...

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

If you love Formula 1, you will love the content on our blog & podcast!